Given the current state of the nation and its sadistic thrusts, it seems as useful as anything I’ve come across lately to state this plainly: that we have hit a moment in history where “warspeak” has taken on a particularly literary trope.
Why am I throwing the word “trope” around? Because two of its definitions include:
1. any literary or rhetorical device, as metaphor, metonymy, synecdoche, and irony, that consists in the use of words in other than their literal sense (imagine here the load of utter bullshit oozing from the mouth of our so-called president and his mis-use of about a gazillion terms in an attempt to distract you with figurative hoo-doo).
2. (in the philosophy of Santayana) the principle of organization according to which matter moves to form an object during the various stages of its existence (I just like this. So there).
And what I am saying is, the talking heads of warspeak—Bush, his cronies, the media, “experts in the field”–are stealing language and literary devices right and left. From us. Writers. Artists. Activists. Ordinary people.
Proof: what we’ve got now is war the serial, the ongoing story, the television production, the mini-series, the movie, the show—and the events—the so-called war on terror, war in Afghanistan, war in Iraq, war on illegal aliens, war on Islamic fascism (particularly dunderheaded idea)–and the representations are no longer distinguishable. The rhetorical and the discursive and the representational have, in other words, done that Baudrillard thing to the nines.
Aside from, of course, the matter of dead bodies, which, conveniently, are ushered off screen or slipped into statistical data so as not to interrupt the narrative flow. Dead bodies are someone’s “report,” or “special segment” on CNN, or an Op-Ed piece—again, all representational.
But the literary troping of contemporary “war”—a term which by the way has lost its moorings representationally and ethically—has utterly atomized the reality it may have at one time attempted to metaphorize. Literature may have troped war, but now war tropes literature, and it aint pretty.
It’s not like I’m the first person to think this up. About a gazillion people have noticed this war troping business, all across history. See list at the tail end of this bad boy.
Some humorous and at the same time serious contemporary manifestations: Cindy Sheehan and John Stewart . . . humorous because apparently the poet activists can appear in the least expected places, and serious because they are doing our work for us.
Then there is the frightening facet of pure fiction and stylized persuasion masquerading as the nightly news . . . simply put: pukedom.
Don’t even get me started on how shitty it is – no, beyond shitty – that these so-called “wars” are displacing event horizons like Darfur. How the Darfur “story” keeps failing to “get air time” or narrative weight. Or Katrina—how bout that? One day of commemorative punk-ass shows while thousands of humans drown in their country’s apathy.
Or our crappy ass shrub-of-a-loser brainless commander in chief saying “we’re in a battle for civilization.” As if the front for the battle of civilization is Iraq. This dude has been reading the bible a little too literally. Jesus Christ.
So what, right?
Well, here’s the thing.
I still believe art can and should stand up to the state rather than suck its dick by producing mindless entertainment and supplicant pigshit. In fact, even though we live in times deadened by consumerism and economy, I still believe it is the best use and function of art to speak the emotions, truths, and realities that organized society refuses to legitimate.
Call me crazy. Call me naïve. Call me not academic enough. Call me a girlie man.
You’d be dead wrong on all counts, because artists need not fit the category of sane, they need not become good and proper citizens, they need not score the big touchdown in academia. And women—since I am the one saying this I’d like to speak from my actual corporeal position instead of pretending it doesn’t matter–need not apologize for being pissed off enough to use their bodies and language to say fuck you, stealers of language.
We—writers, artists–just need to make art.
If writers wanted to, we could effect change, and not simply in candlelight vigils and highly publicized and sanctioned literary “events.” If we wanted to, we could go underground and punch our way up and through this shit. Because between you and me, I’ve about had it with relegating writers and writing to some impotent realm of academia and prizes and conferences. Or worse, snagging a spot on a talk show. Interviewed by NPR (god love em, but still…). Sidelined like bat-boys. Ball-less in our pretty utterances. Do we really want to look like congress? What a bunch of punks.
So.
I’m throwing it out there as a challenge. Any writers or artists want to make some noise not sanctioned by the okey-dokey meisters? Anybody want to steal language back from the artless and spineless morons currently controlling it?
Anybody want to interrupt war the serial with a linguistic insurgence? One coming from a place of love (hey, love can be loud too, baby) and fierce creativity, rather than death, killing, and economy?
If so, lemme know.
Oh and by the way: nationalism ought not be confused with religion, buying and consuming ought not be confused with being, and US citizens ought to wake the fuck up—because we’re the ones doing it.
With love and a pounding heart,
Lidia, an ordinary person, writer, mother, wife.
———————————————————————————————————
Paul Fussell, Robert Hughes, Paul Virilio, Andrei Codrescu, Hannah Arendt, Simone Weil, Noam Chomsky, Czeslaw Milosz, Fredric Jameson, Walter Benjamin, Edward Said, James William Gibson, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Kathy Acker, Marguerite Duras, Monique Wittig, Leslie Silko, Doris Lessing, Baudrillard, Derrida, Adorno, Joy Harjo, hell, remember Don DeLillo’s White Noise? Before he was Mr. Big and writing tomes about baseball? I’m sure you can all think of other even better examples as well.
This is the best thing I’ve read all month–scratch that. year.
I agree with most of what Lidia says, but wonder whether the takeover of language by propaganda isn’t simply worse than ever before, rather than unusual. The yellow journalism that played cheerleader to the Spanish American War may even be more extreme than what we see these days, but what makes our current acceptance of propaganda worse is that we, as a society, have at our disposal resources to get the news that CNN, FOX, the NYT won’t give us, especially if it comes in the days before another crooked presidential election. We could and should know better–that’s what makes our situation worse.
Doug Nufer
And Sontag noted the idiocy of a war on cancer, and there was the noble notion of a war on poverty, but this is beside the point. Though not necessarily beside the pointless. I’m all for the rhetorical, as I wonder if the either/or of words as little cups of truth or butterscotch isn’t just an end game. For the point to the pointlessness to me is to make meaning out of both the facts and fillips of rhetoric — we are in a battle for civilization. And civilized people resist.
I’m playing devil’s advocate for the most part here, because I couldn’t agree with Lidia more, both emotionally and rationally, but I am a bit confused by the concept of “stealing language” in this context. I’m not sure it can be stolen, only used (ie misused, depending on which side(s) you’re on). The farther back you go, the less distinguishable politics and literature are from one another. Right now literature seems to be more of a historical field, than anything else, and creative writing a “trade” that can, at best, better prepare you for the slightly more lucrative occupations of screenwriting or journalism (or speechwriting, for that matter). This seems partly due to the advancing technologies (utilized for communication, entertainment, mind-control, art) that we haven’t been able to keep up with, and partly due to academic overspecialization (preservation) so everybody can have a “job” at least vaguely related to doing what we really love (reading and writing books). It is a shame that those who are the most language-sensitive tend to be stuck in these sorts of cul-de-sacs, because we’re the first to notice when language is being “abused” (ie are best equipped to know when to blow the whistle), and I’d like to think there’s a way to break out into “the-world-at-large” and turn some ears (if I didn’t think it was possible, or at least the most “moral” endeavor, I would have quit trying long ago), but how? Right now you must either force it down peoples’ throats, or make the “language package” (whatever form it might take) so insidiously appealing that they will eagerly ingest it. Otherwise its just more painstakingly crafted, esoteric samizdat, and you’re essentially only preaching to the ivory choir, (of course always hoping to hit on some magic combination one day that will leak out into the mainstream and blow some minds). In other words, I think most of us are already “whistling,” but it’s at a frequency only certain dogs can hear. Broaden the frequency too much, it becomes “user friendly” (God, I love that phrase): consumed, but largely misunderstood, by the greater population, and subsequently written off by those with more refined hearing. So when do these dogs have their day? Is it long gone? It would be hard for anyone to take the statement that poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world at this point in time even remotely seriously. How do we break back into the mix and still make music? This isn’t to say anyone should ever quit trying (never quit!), but it is, arguably, a more serious challenge than it ever has been before. The overwhelming access to information Doug spoke of makes it that much more so, both in terms of craft and responsibility. Somebody will probably want to shoot me for saying it, but maybe “A Canticle for Leibowitz” should be assigned more frequently than “Ulysses” right now, if we really want to get a point across.
Super mucho grande love, Zack
I used to hate America for all the usual, gross materialism, stagnant government, shitty schools, shitty roads, shitty taxes, well, America felt just shitty. I used to rage at the blatent brainwashing I saw, I used to turn my nose to it all, blah, blah, blah. But, there I was watching the news when a picture of one of the few black guys to graduate with me from my white computer waifer highschool in Beavertron flashed on screen. Dead. Iraq. He will be missed. End. It blew me away, it could have been my brother who was also over there. I told my father about my outrage at the waste, and he being in his fifties just said ‘now you know how I felt.’
So I took off to Korea where I was not welcomed with open arms, but with an open hand on one memerable occasion. I was spit on. thrown out of bars, trains, and a toilet (that one may bave been my fault). I wanted to stand there in Korea and be disgusted with my country, for them to pat my back and say, ‘we understand.’ Not so. The unescabable fact is I am American. You can never really be an expatriot. No maple leaf on a back pack, no canadian afectation can cover it up. That’s when I realized, I had to choose the kind of American I was going to be.
When I got home, I donated my car. I take the freakin bus now. I donated a lot of my clothes, didn’t need them. I got rid of a lot of my cD’s. I am nt going to be an American who bitches and bemoans the state of affairs, I will set an example the best I can. I do not want to be spit on again and feel that I don’t have the right to smack the spitee like I did the last time.
Most of all, I want that guy, who I can’t remember his name because I don’t have a year book, to not be wasted. If I say something, I mean it, if I write something, I’ll stand behind it. If he can die for this country then I can stay here and vote, write, love, speak, listen, dance, read, laugh, and be. The way he can’t.
Yeah.
TTFN
Caitlin